Sign up with your email address to be the first to know about new products, VIP offers, blog features & more.

Why your company doesn’t hire internal job candidates and goes with the external candidates

int

Internal job candidates shouldn’t always think the grass is greener

Woes of Internal Candidates

The struggles of internal job candidates come up constantly in my conversations. Usually sideways.

It starts with someone who is still employed, increasingly frustrated, and convinced the solution is to leave the company entirely. When I slow the conversation down, it almost always ends in one of two places:

  • A conflict with a manager or coworker

  • A belief that internal transfers “don’t really happen here”

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: quitting to escape people rarely works. Every company has personalities, politics, and friction. You don’t fix that by changing logos. You fix it by learning how to navigate work, not just endure it.

If you like the company but feel stuck, an internal move is often the smartest first play. Starting over externally means rebuilding reputation, trust, and context from zero. Internal transfers skip that tax.

And yet, many people fail at them. Repeatedly.

“They Don’t Hire Internal Candidates”

They do. They’re just not hiring you.

That doesn’t make HR malicious or blind. It usually means the internal candidate misunderstood the bar.

I’ve interviewed a lot of internal candidates. The pattern is consistent.

They underestimate the interview.

Internal Candidates Take the Interview for Granted

Familiarity creates comfort. Comfort creates blind spots.

Internal candidates walk into interviews with unspoken assumptions:

  • “They already know me.”

  • “They know my work.”

  • “I’m a safer bet than an outsider.”

None of those assumptions help you.

In fact, the expectations for internal candidates are higher, not lower. Why wouldn’t they be? You have more access, more context, and more time to prepare than any external applicant.

And yet, external candidates routinely outperform internals in interviews.

Not because they’re better.
Because they’re trying harder.

What External Candidates Do Well

External candidates behave like long shots.

They:

  • Network their way into context before the interview

  • Research the department, not just the job title

  • Understand the business model, not just the role

  • Show respect through preparation and presentation

  • Assume competition is fierce, because it is

They treat the interview like it’s their only shot.

What Internal Candidates Often Do Instead

Internal candidates frequently:

  • Skip pre-interview conversations entirely

  • Assume existing knowledge is sufficient

  • Dress like it’s a normal workday

  • Overweight tenure as a deciding factor

  • Enter with a “nothing to lose” mindset

That mindset shows. And it costs them.

Home-Court Advantage Is Real (If You Use It)

Internal candidates don’t just have an advantage. They have access.

Walking into an interview as your first interaction with the hiring manager is not bad luck. It’s a missed opportunity.

Internal transfers should be the easiest way to land your next role. They fail when candidates treat them as entitlements instead of auditions.

If you don’t believe that, imagine how much an external candidate would give to have your level of access.

Internal moves rarely fail because of skill.
They fail because of timing, signaling, and misread incentives.

If you’re navigating career decisions, this is the terrain I explore more deeply in Behind Closed Doors: Career Decisions | What HR Executives Know About Career Decisions That Nobody Will Tell You

 

 

See you at the after party,

HRNasty

nasty: an unreal maneuver of incredible technique, something that is ridiculously good, tricky, and manipulative but with a result that can’t help but be admired, a phrase used to describe someone good at something. “He has a nasty forkball”.

Ongoing writing and context live on LinkedIn and Bluesky.

Subscribe to the free weekly updates here. I promise, no spam.

 

 

9 Responses
  • Adele McCann
    November 25, 2017

    I take it HRNasty didn’t get his job on the strength of his spelling and grammar…..

  • brian
    November 3, 2016

    To borrow a line from Douglas Adams (who borrowed it from someone else) ” [HR] shall be first against the wall when the revolution comes”

  • Trinigurl98
    July 23, 2015

    Great article and excellent points made.

  • Darin Clements
    December 29, 2014

    I like to read this crap for laughs. The people responsible for these less-than-insightful “articles” are a joke. It really makes one wonder if they’re just J-school twerps practicing their writing skills, or if they are bottom rung HR assistants.
    Either way, thanks for the laughs.

  • zery
    August 8, 2014

    Reading this, I can’t help but think that the holier than thou author ate a big plate
    of stupid right before he wrote this piece. While I’m sure that there are people who don’t
    get hired internally because of their own lack of preparation, there are just
    as many applicants who do take the interview process very seriously and who are
    still unfairly overlooked for the candidacy. Your article neglects to
    mention that many companies don’t like to hire internally because it actually
    causes them to have to train someone for the position that will need to be
    filled if you were to be promoted, and then of course train you for the
    position you’ve been promoted to – it’s twice the work, and since HR are the
    laziest workers in an organization, messing with your opportunity suits them just fine because they just don’t want to have to work any harder than they don’t already work. In every single company I’ve worked at, HR doesn’t do anything; they are the dead weight
    of a company and are simply put in place to be upper management’s puppet. You also neglected to mention that the reason why a lot of people are not promoted is because when there finally is a decent spot open, that’s when upper management decides to bring in their son, cousin, or best friend through the back door.
    You need a big dose of reality – your article is out of touch in regards to the way
    organizations actually work.

    • Krista
      December 10, 2015

      On point zeary . I’ve observed the culture of my company for a couple of years, so know it works the way you’ve described. But I had to take the action and ask for the opportunity that opened up. My request was for all the right reasons. I had to see if it was worth staying. It pissed some people off but that’s the nature of change. I also had the instinct not to go to my main boss first. I stand by that decision. I’m passionate about what I’m doing; he’s frustrated most of the time. What kind of advocate would he have made for my successful transfer? I wasn’t sure. If you really want to know someone, watch what they do. It will speak volumes more than what they say.

      I talked to professionals who gave me great advice. I then met with someone at the company and stated my case. I had only ever spoken to this person casually. It’s that kind of place, most of the higher ups keep distance and let the HR person handle personnel – well, my professionals told me to skip HR as it wasn’t her job at this company to be my advocate on such a change.

      Even though I had two other companies showing interest in me, I was scared shitless to have the meeting. But I needed to know how much they valued me without making my request seem threatening or being communicated sketchily. So, I had to speak for myself to the person I believed would communicate well my goals and reasoning to a tough crowd..

      I got the job a month ago. They’ve been challenged to find a replacement for my old job, so I’m doing the work of three or four and still not the full duties of my new job. Not surprisingly, I’ve been harassed by HR since the change – accusations of things that do not correlate with my performance or who I am, lack of appreciation for my sacrifices, my time being counted to the minute when I’ve given so much of it for free. I have no doubt this is being filtered through people who wanted me to stay in my place, as it benefited them and their favorites. But my decision wasn’t personal; everyone knew I was going to school to obtain higher credentials. I’m sure conjecture has been thrown around to create dirt. I’m constantly being watched now.

      The puppet pointed out that I’d changed a lot – a negative statement – but didn’t explain what she meant. Love HR. The change she’d witnessed was me becoming more dispassionate due to the lack of support and humanity I’d been experiencing while working very hard. I was getting bored, depressed. I was ready for a higher position with more mature people.

      I’ve learned more about my ability to walk through fear. It’s true – if you don’t believe in yourself, no one else will. Also, it’s okay for people to resent you for taking care of yourself. It’s also okay that I’m a private person and HR doesn’t know everything about me. I’m 100% sure now that keeping some distance from certain people works best for me.. If people at work knew the winners I surround myself with they’d discover yet another layer – but I have lots of layers. I use what I learn and I have faith in something bigger than me.

  • thadea
    March 11, 2014

    Egotistical narcissists such as the cunt writing this article should be the first to go at any company as they are hurting talent within and that make leaving the present company as an easier option than dealing with such cancers as well as taking their years of experience with them. This is a fine example at how destructive HRs cost companies a bundle.

  • gander2112
    January 1, 2014

    One time, an internal candidate (who lived in the same city, and worked ostensibly out of the same office) interviewed by phone.

    Seriously, if you want the job, even if you are internal, show up to the interview.

  • Todd Bennett
    November 1, 2013

    HR departments are cancer to the employees.

    Leave a Reply